Monthly Archive for April, 2010
How can one be a rebel today? How can one not! To exist is to defy all that threatens you. To be a rebel is not to accumulate a library of subversive books or to dream of fantastic conspiracies or of taking to the hills. It is to make yourself your own law. To find in yourself what counts. To make sure that you’re never “cured” of your youth. To prefer to put everyone up against the wall rather than to remain supine. To pillage in this age whatever can be converted to your law, without concern for appearance. By contrast, I would never dream of questioning the futility of seemingly lost struggles. Think of Patrick Pearse. I’ve also spoken of Solzhenitsyn, who personifies the magic sword of which Junger speaks, “the magic sword that makes tyrants tremble.” In this Solzhenitsyn is unique and inimitable. But he owed this power to someone who was less great than himself. To someone who should gives us cause to reflect. In “The Gulag Archipelago,” he tells the story of his “revelation.” In 1945, he was in a cell at Boutyrki Prison in Moscow, along with a dozen other prisoners, whose faces were emaciated and whose bodies broken. One of the prisoners, though, was different. He was an old White Guard colonel, Constantin Iassevitch. He had been imprisoned for his role in the Civil War. Solzhenitsyn says the colonel never spoke of his past, but in every facet of his attitude and behavior it was obvious that the struggle had never ended for him. Despite the chaos that reigned in the spirits of the other prisoners, he retained a clear, decisive view of the world around him. This disposition gave his body a presence, a flexibility, an energy that defied its years. He washed himself in freezing cold water each morning, while the other prisoners grew foul in their filth and lament. A year later, after being transferred to another Moscow prison, Solzhenitsyn learned that the colonel had been executed. “He had seen through the prison walls with eyes that remained perpetually young. . . . This indomitable loyalty to the cause he had fought had given him a very uncommon power.” In thinking of this episode, I tell myself that we can never be another Solzhenitsyn, but it’s within the reach of each of us to emulate the old White colonel.
- Taken from an interview with Dominique Venner.
“…a requirement of love, desire, work, discipline, enthusiasm and energy. {} Tell me what you give, I’ll tell you what you are. Work, in some small way… even quietly, but seriously. That, or shut up.”
April 25, 2010
On the 35th anniversary of Sergio Ramelli’s death a dozen people belonging to Blocco Studentesco Verona painted a mural in his memory on the street named after him. “We decided to conduct this action” – said Alessandro Gandini, head of Blocco Studentesco Verona – “in order to show that the memory of Sergio is still alive while ensuring that the students of Verona are aware of the vile anti-fascist aggression which caused his death and to ensure a similar event will never happen again.” While creating the mural the members of Blocco Studentesco were interrupted by the arrival of police. “Despite the fact the police were given notice of the commemorative action which was to take place 4 days before the anniversary of Sergio’s murder,” – indicated Marcello Ruffo, Caspound coordinator for the region of Veneto – “we were all taken to the police station for questioning, and had all materials seized in order to prevent completion of the mural.”
“They probably were informed of vandalism”, continued Gandini, “however, we could not have imagined that the authorities would have responded in a such heavy handed fashion against what was meant to be an act of remembrance, and we remain convinced that such sanction against the creation of this beautiful mural is nothing compared to Sergio’s sacrifice, ensuring there will be no more politically-motivated homicide”.
Blocco Studentesco militants have invited everybody to gather at Cutty Sark, 30 Via Poloni on Thursday 29th at 20.00 to then head to Via Ramelli in order to commemorate, like every year, Sergio’s death.
Life here on earth cannot be viewed as a coincidence. Moreover, it should not be regarded as something we can either accept or reject at will, nor as a reality that imposes itself on us, before which we can only remain passive, or display an attitude of obtuse resignation. Rather, what arises in some people is the sensation that earthly life is something to which, prior to our becoming terrestrial beings, we have committed ourselves, both as an adventure and as a mission or a chosen task, undertaking a whole set of problematic and tragic elements as well.
- Excerpt From: Etica Aria, by Julius Evola
And so it begins!
Official release June 21, 2010. Bookings for the special edition of the disc are being taken as of today. Price: 20 euros. The offer lasts until June 21.
How?
- By writing to: perimetros [at] gmail [dot] com or latestadiferro [at] libero [dot] it
- By going directly to the La Testa di Ferro shop.
They will then give you directions on how and where to send the payment.
One of the secret lies of liberal democracy is the dogma of free speech. The word ‘propaganda’ has obtained over the last six decades a nasty flavor; hence the need to use the word ‘communication.’ However, as much as everybody in modern society craves to communicate, traditional community ties, or in-group ties, are more than ever before subject to the process of disintegration. It is worth recalling that etymologically the terms “community” and “communication” are of the same origin. But how can one communicate if community no longer exists?
To provide a make-believe image of absolute freedom of speech, the media and the modern Prince resort to a hyperbolic language filled with hyperreal metaphors and qualifiers. This is especially true regarding the terms ‘democracy’ and ‘human rights’. These terms have assumed the emotional role in rallying political allegiance formerly reserved for terms evoking nationhood and patriotism. Opinion makers in Europe and America are not so much concerned with the content of their language, but rather with the appropriate packaging of the language and its emotional impact on the masses.
For effective communication a modern politician (or the modern Prince?) is required to use images with a cheerful setting and a happy ending scenario. His looks are important too. An aspiring presidential candidate must be concerned more with his dentures than with his deontology. A well-fitting Armani suit and polished Gucci shoes are far more important than his IQ. The image is essential since it does not encourage reflection, but obliterates all reflection. The hyperreal image on TV screens with all the trappings of wealth, power, and personal appeal is ideal for propagating new political lies and, by extension, for instituting horrendous political censorship.
For a European or American politician who aspires to high office, the ritual of repentance has become de rigueur.
- Excerpt From: Communication: The Terror of the Hyperreal, by Tomislav Sunic